Final Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Statement Feir Eis For The Proposed Amselco Colosseum Project
DOWNLOAD
Download Final Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Statement Feir Eis For The Proposed Amselco Colosseum Project PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Final Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Statement Feir Eis For The Proposed Amselco Colosseum Project book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages. If the content not found or just blank you must refresh this page
Final Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Statement Feir Eis For The Proposed Amselco Colosseum Project
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1985
Final Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Statement Feir Eis For The Proposed Amselco Colosseum Project written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1985 with Gold mines and mining categories.
Amselco Colosseum Project
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1985
Amselco Colosseum Project written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1985 with categories.
Federal Register
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1985-03
Federal Register written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1985-03 with Administrative law categories.
Final Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Statement For Proposed Arco Coal Oil Point Project Finalized Addendum
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1987
Final Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Statement For Proposed Arco Coal Oil Point Project Finalized Addendum written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1987 with Environmental impact statements categories.
Mojave Northward Expansion Project Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Statement Executive Summary
DOWNLOAD
Author : United States. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1995
Mojave Northward Expansion Project Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Statement Executive Summary written by United States. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1995 with Environmental impact statements categories.
Proposed Plan Amendment And Final Environmental Impact Statement For The Alta East Wind Project
DOWNLOAD
Author : United States. Bureau of Land Management. Ridgecrest Field Office
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2013
Proposed Plan Amendment And Final Environmental Impact Statement For The Alta East Wind Project written by United States. Bureau of Land Management. Ridgecrest Field Office and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2013 with California Desert National Conservation Area (Calif.) categories.
This document originally was intended to be published for agency and public review as a joint environmental analysis prepared by the BLM under FLPMA and NEPA, and by the County under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The County independently certified the CEQA analysis as a Final Environmental Impact Report in compliance with state law, and the BLM now is publishing this Proposed Plan Amendment and Final Environmental Impact Assessment (PA/EIS) pursuant solely to FLPMA and NEPA. Any reference in the document to the EIS/EIR is intended to refer exclusively to the PA/EIS. This PA/EIS analyzes the impacts of the Alta East Wind Project (AEWP) proposed by Alta Windpower Development LLC (Proponent). The AWEP would generate up to 318 megawatts (MWs) on a 2,592-acre site, which includes BLM-administered public land as well as approximately 568 acres of private land. Project components would include wind turbines, a substation, operation and maintenance facilities, transmission lines, and temporary construction laydown areas.
Eis Cumulative
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1985
Eis Cumulative written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1985 with Environmental impact statements categories.
Draft Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report Eis Eir For The Granite Mountain Wind Energy Project
DOWNLOAD
Author : Roxie C. Trost
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2010
Draft Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report Eis Eir For The Granite Mountain Wind Energy Project written by Roxie C. Trost and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2010 with Electric power distribution categories.
Granite Wind LLC, the Applicant, is proposing to develop an up to 84-megawatt wind energy plant and associated facilities on about 100 acres within a larger 2,756-acre area that includes 2,086 acres of public lands administered by the BLM Barstow Field Office and 670 acres of privately-owned land under the County of San Bernardino land-use jurisdiction. The site of the Proposed Action is located on unincorporated land in the Mojave Desert, approximately six miles east of the Town of Apple Valley and five miles northwest of the unincorporated community of Lucerne Valley, on the central ridge of the Granite Mountains. Also included in the proposal are a new access road to the project site, a new transmission line from the project site to an existing 220kV Southern California Edison (SCE) transmission line located in a utility corridor east of the site, and a new approximately 10-acre electrical substation (Jasper Substation) at the site of the SCE interconnection. In addition, the proposal includes an amendment to the CDCA Plan that would designate the proposed site as suitable for wind energy generation and allow for Siting of approximately 1 mile of the new 3.2-to 4.7-mile transmission line from the project site to be located outside of a utility corridor.
Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2 Chapter 4 1 4 10
DOWNLOAD
Author : Marie Meredith
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1996-07-01
Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2 Chapter 4 1 4 10 written by Marie Meredith and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1996-07-01 with categories.
Impacts Evaluated in Other Sections: A summary of where to find topics associated with the section's analysis which are addressed elsewhere in the EIR/EIS. Affected Environment (Setting): A description of the existing conditions for each environmental discipline. The setting acts as a baseline to which the analysis compares the effects of the alternatives and components. Evaluation Criteria with Point of Significance: A table presenting the criteria used to determine specific impacts, measurements used to determine whether an impact is 'significant,' and the point at which the impact becomes significant (See Glossary, in Volume III, for a definition of 'Significant.') The source and justification for each criterion is also identified in the table. Methodology: A brief description of how the impact analysis was done. Environmental Consequences (Impacts) and Recommended Mitigation: A presentation of the results of the environmental analysis for each discipline, including the identification of impacts, the determination regarding significance, the description of mitigation measures proposed to avoid or lessen impacts, and whether mitigation will reduce the effects to less than significant. These analyses are presented in the following order: Component Impact Analysis; Each component's environmental impacts are assessed for each criterion. When impacts are identified a table is provided with the evaluation criterion, the point of significance, the impact the component would have on the environment, the type of impact (construction, operation and maintenance, permanent), and the level of significance. The level of significance identifies the level of the impact both before and after mitigation. For each criterion, an analysis of the expected impacts is presented and, if necessary mitigation measures for each impact argd2g9=al$bc.
Final Environmental Impact Statement For The Jea Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustor Project
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2000
Final Environmental Impact Statement For The Jea Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustor Project written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2000 with categories.
This EIS assesses environmental issues associated with constructing and demonstrating a project that would be cost-shared by DOE and JEA (formerly the Jacksonville Electric Authority) under the Clean Coal Technology Program. The project would demonstrate circulating fluidized bed (CFB) combustion technology at JEA's existing Northside Generating Station in Jacksonville, Florida, about 9 miles northeast of the downtown area of Jacksonville. The new CFB combustor would use coal and petroleum coke to generate nearly 300 MW of electricity by repowering the existing Unit 2 steam turbine, a 297.5-MW unit that has been out of service since 1983. The proposed project is expected to demonstrate emission levels of sulfur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NO3, and particulate matter that would be lower than Clean Air Act limits while at the same time producing power more efficiently and at less cost than conventional coal utilization technologies. At their own risk, JEA has begun initial construction activities without DOE funding. Construction would take approximately two years and, consistent with the original JEA schedule, would be completed in December 2001. Demonstration of the proposed project would be conducted during a 2-year period from March 2002 until March 2004. In addition, JEA plans to repower the currently operating Unit 1 steam turbine about 6 to 12 months after the Unit 2 repowering without cost-shared funding from DOE. Although the proposed project consists of only the Unit 2 repowering, this EIS analyzes the Unit 1 repowering as a related action. The EIS also considers three reasonably foreseeable scenarios that could result from the no-action alternative in which DOE would not provide cost-shared funding for the proposed project. The proposed action, in which DOE would provide cost-shared finding for the proposed project, is DOE's preferred alternative. The EIS evaluates the principal environmental issues, including air quality, traffic, noise, and ecological resources, that could result from construction and operation of the proposed project. Key findings include that maximum modeled increases in ground-level concentrations of SO2 nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and particulate matter (for the proposed project alone or in conjunction with the related action) would always be less than 10% of their corresponding standards for increases in pollutants. For potential cumulative air quality impacts, results of modeling regional sources and the proposed project indicate that the maximum 24-hour average SO2 concentration would closely approach (i.e., 97%) but not exceed the corresponding Florida standard. After the Unit 1 repowering, results indicate that the maximum 24-hour average SO2 concentration would be 91% of the Florida standard. Concentrations for other averaging periods and pollutants would be lower percentages of their standards. Regarding toxic air pollutants from the proposed project, the maximum annual cancer risk to a member of the public would be approximately 1 in 1 million; given the conservative assumptions in the estimate, the risk would probably be less. With regard to threatened and endangered species, impacts to manatees, gopher tortoises, and other species would be negligible or non-existent. Construction-induced traffic would result in noticeable congestion. In the unlikely event that all coal were transported by rail, up to 3 additional trains per week would exacerbate impacts associated with noise, vibration, and blocked roads at on-grade rail crossings. Additional train traffic could be minimized by relying more heavily on barges and ships for coal transport, which is likely to be a more economic fuel delivery mode. During construction of the proposed project, noise levels would increase from the current operational levels. Except possibly during steam blowouts and possibly during operation of equipment used to construct a nearby segment of a conveyor, construction noise should not appreciably affect the background noise of nearby residences or exceed local noise limitations. The preferred alternative for management of the combustion ash would be to sell it as a by-product to offsite customers. If more than approximately 70% of the ash could be sold over the 30-year lifetime of Northside Generating Station, the 40-acre storage site would be sufficient for complete containment.