Sloan V United States Of America
DOWNLOAD
Download Sloan V United States Of America PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Sloan V United States Of America book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages. If the content not found or just blank you must refresh this page
Sloan V United States Of America
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1986
Sloan V United States Of America written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1986 with categories.
United States Of America V Sloan
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1991
United States Of America V Sloan written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1991 with categories.
In The Supreme Court Of The United States Samuel H Sloan Vs Bank Of America And Guide Dogs For The Blind Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari First Appeal Case
DOWNLOAD
Author : Samuel H. Sloan
language : en
Publisher: Ishi Press
Release Date : 2013-07
In The Supreme Court Of The United States Samuel H Sloan Vs Bank Of America And Guide Dogs For The Blind Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari First Appeal Case written by Samuel H. Sloan and has been published by Ishi Press this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2013-07 with Law categories.
This is a petition for a writ of certiorari filed in the United States Supreme Court regarding the Estate of Michael Goodall, a well known and prominent chess personality and FIDE international arbiter and organizer, recognized by the World Chess Federation. Immediately following the death of Mike Goodall in October 2010, Bank of America moved to seize the entire Goodall Assets, even to the point of burglary, breaking into the Goodall mansion and stealing all of the property. Petitioner Samuel H. Sloan, Administrator of the Goodall Estate, filed a petition in Marin County Probate Court thereby forcing Bank of America to return the Goodall property. However, Bank of America filed a counter petition in San Francisco Probate Court to take over all the assets of the Goodall Estate, even though none of the Goodall assets were in San Francisco County. For the last nearly three years this case has been running in parallel in two different and conflicting courts with neither court willing to transfer the case to the other court because of the huge amount of money involved. This conflict has led to this case being filed in the United States Supreme Court.
Sloan Vs Ware And Bank Of America Clerk S Transcript On Appeal Vol 4
DOWNLOAD
Author : Samuel H. Sloan
language : en
Publisher: Ishi Press
Release Date : 2013-03
Sloan Vs Ware And Bank Of America Clerk S Transcript On Appeal Vol 4 written by Samuel H. Sloan and has been published by Ishi Press this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2013-03 with Law categories.
SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO APPEALS DIVISION IN RE The Goodall Trust Appeal No. A137739 Superior Court No. PTR-99-273030 SAM WARE, Movant and Respondent, vs. SAMUEL H. SLOAN Defendant and Appellant, v. Bank of America, N. A. Plaintiff _____________________________________________________ CLERK'S TRANSCRIPT ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO APPEAL FILED ON 01/28/13 THE HONORABLE PETER J. BUSCH VOL 3 of 5 The Record of this Case includes the following documents: Sloan vs. Ware and Bank of America Appellant's Opening BriefISBN 4-87187-370-6 Sloan vs. Ware and Bank of America Clerk's Transcript on Appeal Vol. 1ISBN 4-87187-371-4 Sloan vs. Ware and Bank of America Clerk's Transcript on Appeal Vol. 2ISBN 4-87187-372-2 Sloan vs. Ware and Bank of America Clerk's Transcript on Appeal Vol. 3ISBN 4-87187-373-0 Sloan vs. Ware and Bank of America Clerk's Transcript on Appeal Vol. 4ISBN 4-87187-374-9 Sloan vs. Ware and Bank of America Clerk's Transcript on Appeal Vol. 5ISBN 4-87187-375-7 In Re The Goodall Trust Appeal No. A137189ISBN 4-87187-361-7 In Re The Goodall Trust Appeal No. A137190ISBN 4-87187-362-5 Goodall Estate Petition for Review Case No. S208891 California Supreme CourtISBN 4-87187-363-3 Goodall Estate Petition for Review Case No. S208895 California Supreme CourtISBN 4-87187-364-1
In The Supreme Court Of The United States Samuel H Sloan Administrator Of Estate Of K Michael Goodall With Will Annexed Vs Bank Of America N A James R Hastings And Guide Dogs For The Blind Inc
DOWNLOAD
Author : Samuel H. Sloan
language : en
Publisher: Ishi Press
Release Date : 2013-07
In The Supreme Court Of The United States Samuel H Sloan Administrator Of Estate Of K Michael Goodall With Will Annexed Vs Bank Of America N A James R Hastings And Guide Dogs For The Blind Inc written by Samuel H. Sloan and has been published by Ishi Press this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2013-07 with Law categories.
Supreme Court of the United States Samuel H. Sloan, Administrator of Estate of K. Michael Goodall with Will Annexed vs. Bank of America N. A. James R. Hastings and Guide Dogs For the Blind, Inc. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Four This is a petition for a writ of certiorari filed in the United States Supreme Court regarding the Estate of Michael Goodall, a well known and prominent chess personality and FIDE international arbiter and organizer, recognized by the World Chess Federation. Immediately following the death of Mike Goodall in October 2010, Bank of America moved to seize the entire Goodall Assets, even to the point of burglary, breaking into the Goodall mansion and stealing all of the property. Petitioner Samuel H. Sloan, Administrator of the Goodall Estate, filed a petition in Marin County Probate Court thereby forcing Bank of America to return the Goodall property. However, Bank of America filed a counter petition in San Francisco Probate Court to take over all the assets of the Goodall Estate, even though none of the Goodall assets were in San Francisco County. For the last nearly three years this case has been running in parallel in two different and conflicting courts with neither court willing to transfer the case to the other court because of the huge amount of money involved. This conflict has led to this case being filed in the United States Supreme Court.
Appendix On Appeal In Sloan Vs Caruso To Us Court Of Appeals
DOWNLOAD
Author : Sam Sloan
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2013-12
Appendix On Appeal In Sloan Vs Caruso To Us Court Of Appeals written by Sam Sloan and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2013-12 with Law categories.
This proceeding is brought under Election Law Sections 16-100 and 16-102 and other provisions of New York Law. Sam Sloan is a candidate for Mayor of the City of New York. Richard Bozulich is a candidate for Comptroller of the City of New York. Thomas R. Stevens is a candidate for Public Advocate of the City of New York. At the Hearing on the Order to Show Cause before Justice Paul Wooten on August 5, 2013, Defendant Board of Elections in the City of New York provided only one grounds for throwing the petitioners of the ballot. That ground was that under Section 132 (2) of New York Election law the subscribing witnesses to a Designating Petition must be registered to vote as a member of the Party whose nomination is being sought, and the subscribing witnesses were not Republicans with only two exceptions. Petitioners had submitted approximately 4500 signatures to run for election whereas only 3750 are required. (There are some differences in the count of the total number of signatures but all counts agree that more than 4200 were filed.) A few of the 4500 signatures collected were found invalid for various reasons including bad address or not registered to vote. However, a core of 3905 signatures were found to be good but invalid for one reason only which is that the Subscribing Witnesses to those petitions were not registered to vote as members of the Republican Party. In other words, had those 3905 signatures been witnessed by a Registered Republican Party Voter, then all three petitioners would be on the ballot. However, because they were witnessed by other voters, including Democrats, Libertarians and Blanks, those 3905 signatures were deemed invalid. Petitioner Sam Sloan is a long standing registered voter in the Republican Party and he also circulated and witnessed some of the petitions and signed one of the petitions himself. The petitions he witnessed were deemed valid but all or almost all of the others were deemed invalid on the ground that the subscribing witness was not registered as a Republican. Frankly, the petitioners are newcomers to this process and were not aware that there was any requirement that the signatures be witnessed by members of any political party. Had they known about this they might have tried to find witnesses who are Republicans but failing that they would likely have given up trying to run for election as finding any witnesses is a difficult task under any circumstances. Witnesses must sign a declaration equivalent to an affidavit under penalty of perjury and must be prepared to be subpoenaed to testify in court under oath. Obviously, not many people are going to be willing to do that. Now that the petitioners have found out the hard way that there is a rule as interpreted by the Board of Elections that says that petitions for Republican Party Candidates must be witnessed (as well as being signed) by REGISTERED voters in the Republican Party, petitioners contend that such a requirement is unconstitutional under the First Amendment right "To Petition the Government." It seems obvious that a requirement that the signatures to a petition of any type are deemed valid if and only if they are witnessed by Registered Republicans cannot be Constitutional. This is an infringement to the constitutional right "to Petition the Government."
Sloan V New York State Board Of Elections Appellants Brief And Appendix Ca2 Case
DOWNLOAD
Author : Neil V. Grimaldi
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2014-11-25
Sloan V New York State Board Of Elections Appellants Brief And Appendix Ca2 Case written by Neil V. Grimaldi and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2014-11-25 with Law categories.
A case was initiated in the New York Supreme Court Albany County seeking to invalidate the New York State Board of Elections. It also sought to place candidates on the ballot after they had been deemed to have insufficient signatures by the New York State Board of Elections. This action was appealed to the New York State Appellate Division Third Department. Then an appeal was made to the New York Court of Appeals which did not hear the case. Thereafter, this case was brought to the United States District Court in Albany by voters whose constitutional election rights were denied to have their candidates on the ballot and by aggrieved candidates who were petitioners, as they are here. Questions Presented Does the New York State Board of Elections violate the United States Constitution and thus should be found unconstitutional and abolished and disbanded as it is presently constituted and a new election held with all candidates restored to the ballot? Statement of the Case The plaintiff-appellants are candidates for office or else are voters who support these candidates, who signed their petitions and want to vote for them for election. The candidates were on the ballot since July 8, 2014 but were thrown off at a meeting by the New York State Board of Elections on August 1, 2014.
Nature House Inc V Sloan
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1981
Nature House Inc V Sloan written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1981 with categories.
Howard V Sloan
DOWNLOAD
Author : United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Claims
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1928
Howard V Sloan written by United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Claims and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1928 with Bills, Private categories.
Sloan Vs New York State Board Of Elections Albany Supreme Court No 4003 14 Decisions Briefs And Record
DOWNLOAD
Author : Neil V. Grimaldi
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2014-08-23
Sloan Vs New York State Board Of Elections Albany Supreme Court No 4003 14 Decisions Briefs And Record written by Neil V. Grimaldi and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2014-08-23 with Law categories.
On or about July 8, 2014 there were filed with the New York State Board of Elections certain papers allegedly constituting petitions purporting to designate for the September 9, 2014 Democratic Party Primary Election Sam Sloan, Candidate for the Democratic Party nomination for Governor, Nenad Bach Candidate for the Democratic Party nomination for Lieutenant Governor and Geeta Rankoth Candidate for the Democratic Party nomination for Comptroller of New York State. These petitions included more than 4000 numbered pages and were facially valid and regular with a cover sheet consistent with New York Election Law and the Rules of the Board of Elections of the State of New York. Upon information and belief the said New York State Board of Elections improperly illegally and in violation of the United States Constitution 14th Amendment due process clause and under the New York State Constitution at an official meeting on August 1, 2014 threw them off the ballot without ever informing Sam Sloan, Candidate for the Democratic Party nomination for Governor, Nenad Bach Candidate for the Democratic Party nomination for Lieutenant Governor and Geeta Rankoth Candidate for the Democratic Party nomination for Comptroller of New York State that there would be a hearing and determination of the validity of their petitions and the possibility of their signatures being invalidated. 2. Order and decree and direct the New York State Board of Elections to restore the names of Sam Sloan, Nenad Bach and Geeta Rankoth to the ballot as Candidates for the Democratic Party nomination for Governor, Lieutenant Governor and Comptroller of New York State to be printed and placed on the official ballots to be used either at the September 9, 2014 Democratic Primary Election and the November 4, 2014 General Election and why the Petitioners should not have such other and further relief as to this court may seem just and proper.