Handbook Of Legal Reasoning And Argumentation


Handbook Of Legal Reasoning And Argumentation
DOWNLOAD

Download Handbook Of Legal Reasoning And Argumentation PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Handbook Of Legal Reasoning And Argumentation book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages. If the content not found or just blank you must refresh this page





Handbook Of Legal Reasoning And Argumentation


Handbook Of Legal Reasoning And Argumentation
DOWNLOAD

Author : Giorgio Bongiovanni
language : en
Publisher: Springer
Release Date : 2018-07-02

Handbook Of Legal Reasoning And Argumentation written by Giorgio Bongiovanni and has been published by Springer this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2018-07-02 with Philosophy categories.


This handbook addresses legal reasoning and argumentation from a logical, philosophical and legal perspective. The main forms of legal reasoning and argumentation are covered in an exhaustive and critical fashion, and are analysed in connection with more general types (and problems) of reasoning. Accordingly, the subject matter of the handbook divides in three parts. The first one introduces and discusses the basic concepts of practical reasoning. The second one discusses the general structures and procedures of reasoning and argumentation that are relevant to legal discourse. The third one looks at their instantiations and developments of these aspects of argumentation as they are put to work in the law, in different areas and applications of legal reasoning.



Legal Reasoning And Legal Theory


Legal Reasoning And Legal Theory
DOWNLOAD

Author : Neil MacCormick
language : en
Publisher: Clarendon Press
Release Date : 1994-08-11

Legal Reasoning And Legal Theory written by Neil MacCormick and has been published by Clarendon Press this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1994-08-11 with Law categories.


What makes an argument in a law case good or bad? Can legal decisions be justified by purely rational argument or are they ultimately determined by more subjective influences? These questions are central to the study of jurisprudence, and are thoroughly and critically examined in Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, now with a new and up-to-date foreword. Its clarity of explanation and argument make this classic legal text readily accessible to lawyers, philosophers, and any general reader interested in legal processes, human reasoning, or practical logic.



Legal Reasoning Writing And Persuasive Argument


Legal Reasoning Writing And Persuasive Argument
DOWNLOAD

Author : Robin S. Wellford
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2002

Legal Reasoning Writing And Persuasive Argument written by Robin S. Wellford and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2002 with Law categories.




Logic For Lawyers


Logic For Lawyers
DOWNLOAD

Author : Ruggero J. Aldisert
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1989

Logic For Lawyers written by Ruggero J. Aldisert and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1989 with Judicial process categories.


This book tackles the basics of legal reasoning in twelve chapters, including the principles of classic logic, deductive and inductive reasoning, application of the Socratic method to legal reasoning, and formal and material fallacies.



Rhetoric And The Rule Of Law


Rhetoric And The Rule Of Law
DOWNLOAD

Author : Neil MacCormick
language : en
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Release Date : 2005-07-28

Rhetoric And The Rule Of Law written by Neil MacCormick and has been published by OUP Oxford this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2005-07-28 with Law categories.


Is legal reasoning rationally persuasive, working within a discernible structure and using recognisable kinds of arguments? Does it belong to rhetoric in this sense, or to the domain of the merely 'rhetorical' in an adversative sense? Is there any reasonable certainty about legal outcomes in dispute-situations? If not, what becomes of the Rule of Law? Neil MacCormick's book tackles these questions in establishing an overall theory of legal reasoning which shows the essential part 'legal syllogism' plays in reasoning aimed at the application of law, while acknowledging that simple deductive reasoning, though always necessary, is very rarely sufficient to justify a decision. There are always problems of relevancy, classification or interpretation in relation to both facts and law. In justifying conclusions about such problems, reasoning has to be universalistic and yet fully sensitive to the particulars of specific cases. How is this possible? Is legal justification at this level consequentialist in character or principled and right-based? Both normative coherence and narrative coherence have a part to play in justification, and in accounting for the validity of arguments by analogy. Looking at such long-discussed subjects as precedent and analogy and the interpretative character of the reasoning involved, Neil MacCormick expands upon his celebrated Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (OUP 1978 and 1994) and restates his 'institutional theory of law'.



Argument Types And Fallacies In Legal Argumentation


Argument Types And Fallacies In Legal Argumentation
DOWNLOAD

Author : Thomas Bustamante
language : en
Publisher: Springer
Release Date : 2015-04-07

Argument Types And Fallacies In Legal Argumentation written by Thomas Bustamante and has been published by Springer this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2015-04-07 with Law categories.


This book provides theoretical tools for evaluating the soundness of arguments in the context of legal argumentation. It deals with a number of general argument types and their particular use in legal argumentation. It provides detailed analyses of argument from authority, argument ad hominem, argument from ignorance, slippery slope argument and other general argument types. Each of these argument types can be used to construct arguments that are sound as well as arguments that are unsound. To evaluate an argument correctly one must be able to distinguish the sound instances of a certain argument type from its unsound instances. This book promotes the development of theoretical tools for this task.



Justice Law And Argument


Justice Law And Argument
DOWNLOAD

Author : Ch. Perelman
language : en
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
Release Date : 2012-12-06

Justice Law And Argument written by Ch. Perelman and has been published by Springer Science & Business Media this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2012-12-06 with Philosophy categories.


This collection contains studies on justice, juridical reasoning and argumenta tion which contributed to my ideas on the new rhetoric. My reflections on justice, from 1944 to the present day, have given rise to various studies. The ftrst of these was published in English as The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1963). The others, of which several are out of print or have never previously been published, are reunited in the present volume. As justice is, for me, the prime example of a "confused notion", of a notion which, like many philosophical concepts, cannot be reduced to clarity without being distorted, one cannot treat it without recourse to the methods of reasoning analyzed by the new rhetoric. In actuality, these methods have long been put into practice by jurists. Legal reasoning is fertile ground for the study of argumentation: it is to the new rhetoric what mathematics is to formal logic and to the theory of demonstrative proof. It is important, then, that philosophers should not limit their methodologi cal studies to mathematics and the natural sciences. They must not neglect law in the search for practical reason. I hope that these essays lead to be a better understanding of how law can enrich philosophical thought. CH. P.



Thinking Like A Lawyer


Thinking Like A Lawyer
DOWNLOAD

Author : Frederick Schauer
language : en
Publisher: Harvard University Press
Release Date : 2012-04-02

Thinking Like A Lawyer written by Frederick Schauer and has been published by Harvard University Press this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2012-04-02 with Law categories.


This primer on legal reasoning is aimed at law students and upper-level undergraduates. But it is also an original exposition of basic legal concepts that scholars and lawyers will find stimulating. It covers such topics as rules, precedent, authority, analogical reasoning, the common law, statutory interpretation, legal realism, judicial opinions, legal facts, and burden of proof.



Fundamentals Of Legal Argumentation


Fundamentals Of Legal Argumentation
DOWNLOAD

Author : Eveline T. Feteris
language : en
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
Release Date : 2013-03-09

Fundamentals Of Legal Argumentation written by Eveline T. Feteris and has been published by Springer Science & Business Media this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2013-03-09 with Philosophy categories.


Legal argumentation is a distinctively multidisciplinary field of inquiry. It draws its data, assumptions and methods from disciplines such as legal theory, legal philosophy, logic, argumentation theory, rhetoric, linguistics, literary theory, philosophy, sociology, and artificial intelligence. This presents the growing group of interested scholars and students with a problem of access, since, even for those active in the field, it is not common to have acquired a familiarity with relevant aspects of each discipline that enters into this multidisciplinary matrix. Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation offers its readers a unique and comprehensive survey of the various theoretical influences which have informed the study of legal argumentation. It discusses salient backgrounds to this field as well as all major approaches and trends in the contemporary research. It surveys relevant theoretical factors both from various continental law traditions and common law countries.



Logical Models Of Legal Argumentation


Logical Models Of Legal Argumentation
DOWNLOAD

Author : H. Prakken
language : en
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
Release Date : 2012-12-06

Logical Models Of Legal Argumentation written by H. Prakken and has been published by Springer Science & Business Media this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2012-12-06 with Law categories.


In the study of forms of legal reasoning, logic and argumentation theory long followed separate tracks. `Legal logicians' tended to focus on a deductive reconstruction of justifying a decision, disregarding the dialectical process leading to the chosen justification. Others instead emphasized the adversarial and discretionary nature of legal reasoning, involving reasonable evaluation of alternative choices, and the use of analogical reasoning. Recently, however, developments in Artificial Intelligence and Law have paved the way for overcoming this separation. Logic has widened its scope to defensible argumentation, and informal accounts of analogy and dialectics have inspired the construction of computer programs. Thus the prospect is emerging of an integrated logical and dialectical account of legal argument, adding to the understanding of legal reasoning, and providing a formal basis for computer tools that assist and mediate legal debates while leaving room for human initiative. This book presents contributions to this development. From a logical point of view it covers topics such as evaluating conflicting arguments, weighing reasons, modelling legal disputes as a dialogue game, the role of the burden of proof, the relation between principles, rules, reasons and facts, and the relation between deductive and nondeductive arguments. Written by leading scholars in the field and building on recent developments in logic and Artificial Intelligence, the chapters provide a state-of-the-art account of research on the logical aspects of legal argument.