[PDF] Improved Operational Testing And Evaluation - eBooks Review

Improved Operational Testing And Evaluation


Improved Operational Testing And Evaluation
DOWNLOAD

Download Improved Operational Testing And Evaluation PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Improved Operational Testing And Evaluation book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages. If the content not found or just blank you must refresh this page



Improved Operational Testing And Evaluation


Improved Operational Testing And Evaluation
DOWNLOAD
Author : National Research Council
language : en
Publisher: National Academies Press
Release Date : 2003-07-11

Improved Operational Testing And Evaluation written by National Research Council and has been published by National Academies Press this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2003-07-11 with Technology & Engineering categories.


The U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) is responsible for the operational testing and evaluation of Army systems in development. ATEC requested that the National Research Council form the Panel on Operational Test Design and Evaluation of the Interim Armored Vehicle (Stryker) to explore three issues concerning the initial operation test plans for the Stryker/Interim Brigade Combat Team (IBCT). First, the panel was asked to examine the measures selected to assess the performance and effectiveness of the Stryker/IBCT in comparison both to requirements and to the baseline system. Second, the panel was asked to review the test design for the Stryker/IBCT initial operational test to see whether it is consistent with best practices. Third, the panel was asked to identify the advantages and disadvantages of techniques for combining operational test data with data from other sources and types of use. In this report the panel presents findings, conclusions, and recommendations pertaining to the first two issues: measures of performance and effectiveness, and test design. The panel intends to prepare a second report that discusses techniques for combining information.



Improved Operational Testing And Evaluation And Methods Of Combining Test Information For The Stryker Family Of Vehicles And Related Army Systems


Improved Operational Testing And Evaluation And Methods Of Combining Test Information For The Stryker Family Of Vehicles And Related Army Systems
DOWNLOAD
Author : National Research Council
language : en
Publisher: National Academies Press
Release Date : 2004-01-29

Improved Operational Testing And Evaluation And Methods Of Combining Test Information For The Stryker Family Of Vehicles And Related Army Systems written by National Research Council and has been published by National Academies Press this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2004-01-29 with Technology & Engineering categories.


The U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) is responsible for the operational testing and evaluation of Army systems in development. ATEC requested that the National Research Council form the Panel on Operational Test Design and Evaluation of the Interim Armored Vehicle (Stryker). The charge to this panel was to explore three issues concerning the IOT plans for the Stryker/SBCT. First, the panel was asked to examine the measures selected to assess the performance and effectiveness of the Stryker/SBCT in comparison both to requirements and to the baseline system. Second, the panel was asked to review the test design for the Stryker/SBCT initial operational test to see whether it is consistent with best practices. Third, the panel was asked to identify the advantages and disadvantages of techniques for combining operational test data with data from other sources and types of use. In a previous report (appended to the current report) the panel presented findings, conclusions, and recommendations pertaining to the first two issues: measures of performance and effectiveness, and test design. In the current report, the panel discusses techniques for combining information.



Phase Ii Report


Phase Ii Report
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2004

Phase Ii Report written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2004 with Armored vehicles, Military categories.




Operational Testing Of Air Force Systems Requires Several Improvements


Operational Testing Of Air Force Systems Requires Several Improvements
DOWNLOAD
Author : United States. General Accounting Office
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1978

Operational Testing Of Air Force Systems Requires Several Improvements written by United States. General Accounting Office and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1978 with categories.




Test And Evaluation An Assessment Of Dod S Operational Test And Evaluation Capability Improvement Program


Test And Evaluation An Assessment Of Dod S Operational Test And Evaluation Capability Improvement Program
DOWNLOAD
Author : GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WASHINGTON DC NATIONAL SECURITY AND INTERNATIONAL A FFAIRS DIV.
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1990

Test And Evaluation An Assessment Of Dod S Operational Test And Evaluation Capability Improvement Program written by GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WASHINGTON DC NATIONAL SECURITY AND INTERNATIONAL A FFAIRS DIV. and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1990 with categories.


We reviewed the jurisdiction and the mission of the Office of the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, including legislative intent, to determine whether the Operational Test and Evaluation (OT & E) Capability Improvement Program is within the scope of that mission or would be more appropriately conducted by another DOD organization. Although the Office of the Director, OT & E's statute does not prohibit it from conducting the OT & E Capability Improvement Program, we believe that the program does not fall within the Office of the Director, OT & E's mission. We therefore recommend that the Secretary of Defense direct and assure that the services plan, program, and budget for adequate test resources needed to conduct operational testing of weapon systems effectively. The Director, OT & E should continue to perform oversight and policy functions by reviewing and making recommendations to the Secretary of Defense to assure that adequate test resources are acquired. (kt).



National Defense


National Defense
DOWNLOAD
Author : U S Government Accountability Office (G
language : en
Publisher: BiblioGov
Release Date : 2013-06

National Defense written by U S Government Accountability Office (G and has been published by BiblioGov this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2013-06 with categories.


An operational test and evaluation is an assessment of mission performance in a system's intended environment when operated, maintained, and supported by personnel with qualifications similar to those who will perform these functions in the field. The Air Force Test and Evaluation Center (AFTEC), established in 1974, is responsible for managing operational test and evaluation and providing an independent assessment on test results to the Secretary of the Air Force and Air Force Chief of Staff. AFTEC has improved Air Force operational testing, and further improvements are being planned. However, there are several limitations in the testing programs. The operational testing conducted by AFTEC was generally not performed in an environment that the systems would encounter when deployed, and the systems were not always operated and maintained by personnel with qualifications of expected users. Also, AFTEC had little control over the resources necessary to conduct initial operational testing. The Air Force practice of combining initial operational test and evaluation programs, while it may save costs, makes it unlikely to achieve the very different objectives of the two types of testing. AFTEC evaluations of operational effectiveness have been limited because they were not based on the most current operational concept. A new policy to provide concepts that will serve as a "contract" between developers and users and will provide current criteria has been incorporated into Air Force regulations.



Testing Oversight


Testing Oversight
DOWNLOAD
Author : United States. General Accounting Office
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1987

Testing Oversight written by United States. General Accounting Office and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1987 with United States categories.




Force Development Operational Testing And Evaluation Methodology And Procedures Guide


Force Development Operational Testing And Evaluation Methodology And Procedures Guide
DOWNLOAD
Author : United States. Department of the Army
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1979

Force Development Operational Testing And Evaluation Methodology And Procedures Guide written by United States. Department of the Army and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1979 with Operations research categories.




Statistics Testing And Defense Acquisition


Statistics Testing And Defense Acquisition
DOWNLOAD
Author : National Research Council
language : en
Publisher: National Academies Press
Release Date : 1998-05-08

Statistics Testing And Defense Acquisition written by National Research Council and has been published by National Academies Press this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1998-05-08 with Technology & Engineering categories.


For every weapons system being developed, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) must make a critical decision: Should the system go forward to full-scale production? The answer to that question may involve not only tens of billions of dollars but also the nation's security and military capabilities. In the milestone process used by DOD to answer the basic acquisition question, one component near the end of the process is operational testing, to determine if a system meets the requirements for effectiveness and suitability in realistic battlefield settings. Problems discovered at this stage can cause significant production delays and can necessitate costly system redesign. This book examines the milestone process, as well as the DOD's entire approach to testing and evaluating defense systems. It brings to the topic of defense acquisition the application of scientific statistical principles and practices.



Test And Evaluation


Test And Evaluation
DOWNLOAD
Author : U. S. Government Accountability Office (
language : en
Publisher: BiblioGov
Release Date : 2013-07

Test And Evaluation written by U. S. Government Accountability Office ( and has been published by BiblioGov this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2013-07 with categories.


GAO reviewed the Department of Defense's (DOD) efforts to improve its software acquisition processes and test and evaluation of software-intensive systems, focusing on: (1) how software-related problems affect defense acquisition programs during operational test and evaluation (OT&E); and (2) barriers that limit OT&E effectiveness. GAO found that: (1) DOD software-intensive systems often fail to meet their performance expectations, experience cost overruns and schedule delays, and are not ready for OT&E because they are not subject to rigorous developmental testing and evaluation and software development is often not fully mature when OT&E begins; (2) DOD has not adequately addressed barriers that inhibit software acquisition and OT&E effectiveness; (3) DOD has not adequately addressed the importance of software development, lacks a consistent policy that defines and coordinates software maturity and operational testing readiness, has not adequately defined and managed software requirements, and lacks reliable cost, schedule, and performance data; (4) DOD has not implemented previous recommendations to ensure that quality software is adequately developed and tested and software-intensive systems are effective; (5) although the military services have tried to improve their software development processes, they lack a DOD-wide coordinated strategy; and (6) the creation of a single executive-level office for software development and testing would help to resolve long-standing software problems.