[PDF] Norms In Argumentation - eBooks Review

Norms In Argumentation


Norms In Argumentation
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK
READ ONLINE

Download Norms In Argumentation PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Norms In Argumentation book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages. If the content not found or just blank you must refresh this page





Norms In Argumentation


Norms In Argumentation
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK
READ ONLINE
Author : Robert Maier
language : en
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG
Release Date : 2019-11-18

Norms In Argumentation written by Robert Maier and has been published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2019-11-18 with Language Arts & Disciplines categories.


No detailed description available for "Norms in Argumentation".



Norms In Argumentation


Norms In Argumentation
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK
READ ONLINE
Author : Robert Maier
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1989

Norms In Argumentation written by Robert Maier and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1989 with categories.




Reflections On Theoretical Issues In Argumentation Theory


Reflections On Theoretical Issues In Argumentation Theory
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK
READ ONLINE
Author : Frans H. van Eemeren
language : en
Publisher: Springer
Release Date : 2015-08-08

Reflections On Theoretical Issues In Argumentation Theory written by Frans H. van Eemeren and has been published by Springer this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2015-08-08 with Philosophy categories.


This volume presents a selection of papers reflecting key theoretical issues in argumentation theory. Its six sections are devoted to specific themes, including the analysis and evaluation of argumentation, argument schemes and the contextual embedding of argumentation. The section on general perspectives on argumentation discusses the trends of empiricalization, contextualization and formalization, offers descriptions of the analytical and evaluative tools of informal logic, and highlights selected principles that argumentation theorists do and do not agree upon. In turn, the section on linguistic approaches to argumentation focuses on the problem of distinguishing between explanation and argument, while also elaborating on the role of verbal indicators of argument schemes. All essays included in this volume point out notable recent developments in the study of argumentation.



Fundamentals Of Argumentation Theory


Fundamentals Of Argumentation Theory
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK
READ ONLINE
Author : Frans H. van Eemeren
language : en
Publisher: Routledge
Release Date : 2013-11-05

Fundamentals Of Argumentation Theory written by Frans H. van Eemeren and has been published by Routledge this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2013-11-05 with Language Arts & Disciplines categories.


Argumentation theory is a distinctly multidisciplinary field of inquiry. It draws its data, assumptions, and methods from disciplines as disparate as formal logic and discourse analysis, linguistics and forensic science, philosophy and psychology, political science and education, sociology and law, and rhetoric and artificial intelligence. This presents the growing group of interested scholars and students with a problem of access, since it is even for those active in the field not common to have acquired a familiarity with relevant aspects of each discipline that enters into this multidisciplinary matrix. This book offers its readers a unique comprehensive survey of the various theoretical contributions which have been made to the study of argumentation. It discusses the historical works that provide the background to the field and all major approaches and trends in contemporary research. Argument has been the subject of systematic inquiry for twenty-five hundred years. It has been graced with theories, such as formal logic or the legal theory of evidence, that have acquired a more or less settled provenance with regard to specific issues. But there has been nothing to date that qualifies as a unified general theory of argumentation, in all its richness and complexity. This being so, the argumentation theorist must have access to materials and methods that lie beyond his or her "home" subject. It is precisely on this account that this volume is offered to all the constituent research communities and their students. Apart from the historical sections, each chapter provides an economical introduction to the problems and methods that characterize a given part of the contemporary research program. Because the chapters are self-contained, they can be consulted in the order of a reader's interests or research requirements. But there is value in reading the work in its entirety. Jointly authored by the very people whose research has done much to define the current state of argumentation theory and to point the way toward more general and unified future treatments, this book is an impressively authoritative contribution to the field.



Fallacies And Judgments Of Reasonableness


Fallacies And Judgments Of Reasonableness
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK
READ ONLINE
Author : Frans H. van Eemeren
language : en
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
Release Date : 2009-08-05

Fallacies And Judgments Of Reasonableness written by Frans H. van Eemeren and has been published by Springer Science & Business Media this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2009-08-05 with Philosophy categories.


In Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. The experimental studies they carried out during more than ten years start from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation developed at the University of Amsterdam, their home university. In these studies they test methodically the intersubjective acceptability of the rules for critical discussion proposed in this theory by confronting ordinary arguers who have not received any special education in argumentation and fallacies with discussion fragments containing both fallacious and non-fallacious argumentative moves. The research covers a wide range of informal fallacies. In this way, the authors create a basis for comparing the theoretical reasonableness conception of pragma-dialectics with the norms for judging argumentative moves prevailing in argumentative practice. Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness provides a unique insight into the relationship between theoretical and practical conceptions of reasonableness, supported by extensive empirical material gained by means of sophisticated experimental research.



Pondering On Problems Of Argumentation


Pondering On Problems Of Argumentation
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK
READ ONLINE
Author : Frans H. van Eemeren
language : en
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
Release Date : 2009-02-11

Pondering On Problems Of Argumentation written by Frans H. van Eemeren and has been published by Springer Science & Business Media this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2009-02-11 with Language Arts & Disciplines categories.


Pondering on Problems of Argumentation is a collection of twenty essays brought together for anyone who is interested in theoretical issues in the study of argumentation. This collection of papers gives the reader an insightful and balanced view of the kind of theoretical issues argumentation theorists are currently concerned with. Because most of the perspectives on argumentation that are en vogue are represented, this volume provides a multidisciplinary and even interdisciplinary outlook on the current state of affairs in argumentation theory. Some of the contributions in Pondering on Problems of Argumentation deal with problems of argumentation that have been recognized as theoretical issues for a considerable time, like the problems of fallaciousness and identifying argumentation structures. Other contributions discuss issues that have become a focus of attention only recently or regained their prominence, such as the relationship between dialectic and rhetoric, and the strategic use of the argumentative technique of dissociation. In five separate sections papers are included dealing with argumentative strategies, problems of norms of reasonableness and fallaciousness, types of argument and argument schemes the structure of argumentation and rules for advocacy and discussion.



Explaining The Normative


Explaining The Normative
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK
READ ONLINE
Author : Stephen P. Turner
language : en
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
Release Date : 2013-05-02

Explaining The Normative written by Stephen P. Turner and has been published by John Wiley & Sons this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2013-05-02 with Philosophy categories.


Normativity is what gives reasons their force, makes words meaningful, and makes rules and laws binding. It is present whenever we use such terms as ‘correct,' ‘ought,' ‘must,' and the language of obligation, responsibility, and logical compulsion. Yet normativists, the philosophers committed to this idea, admit that the idea of a non-causal normative realm and a body of normative objects is spooky. Explaining the Normative is the first systematic, historically grounded critique of normativism. It identifies the standard normativist pattern of argument, and shows how this pattern depends on circularities, assumptions about the unique correctness of preferred descriptions, problematic transcendental arguments, and regress arguments that end in mysteries. The book considers in detail a paradigm case: legal normativity as constructed by Hans Kelsen. This case exemplifies the problems with normativist arguments. But it also shows how normativism was constructed as an alternative to ordinary social science explanation. The normativist argument is that social science explanations themselves are forced to rely on normative conceptsÑminimally, on normative rationality and on a normative view of ‘concepts' themselves. Empathic understanding of the reasoning and meanings of others, however, can solve the regress problems about meaning and rationality that are central to the appeal of normativism. This account has no need for a parallel normative world, and has a surprising and revealing lineage in the history of philosophy, as well as a basis in neuroscience.



Legal Argumentation Theory Cross Disciplinary Perspectives


Legal Argumentation Theory Cross Disciplinary Perspectives
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK
READ ONLINE
Author : Christian Dahlman
language : en
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
Release Date : 2012-09-12

Legal Argumentation Theory Cross Disciplinary Perspectives written by Christian Dahlman and has been published by Springer Science & Business Media this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2012-09-12 with Law categories.


This book offers its readers an overview of recent developments in the theory of legal argumentation written by representatives from various disciplines, including argumentation theory, philosophy of law, logic and artificial intelligence. It presents an overview of contributions representative of different academic and legal cultures, and different continents and countries. The book contains contributions on strategic maneuvering, argumentum ad absurdum, argumentum ad hominem, consequentialist argumentation, weighing and balancing, the relation between legal argumentation and truth, the distinction between the context of discovery and context of justification, and the role of constitutive and regulative rules in legal argumentation. It is based on a selection of papers that were presented in the special workshop on Legal Argumentation organized at the 25th IVR World Congress for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy held 15-20 August 2011 in Frankfurt, Germany.



The Uses Of Argument


The Uses Of Argument
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK
READ ONLINE
Author : Stephen Toulmin
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2003

The Uses Of Argument written by Stephen Toulmin and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2003 with Logic categories.


A central theme throughout the impressive series of philosophical books and articles Stephen Toulmin has published since 1948 is the way in which assertions and opinions concerning all sorts of topics, brought up in everyday life or in academic research, can be rationally justified. Is there one universal system of norms, by which all sorts of arguments in all sorts of fields must be judged, or must each sort of argument be judged according to its own norms? In The Uses of Argument (1958) Toulmin sets out his views on these questions for the first time. In spite of initial criticisms from logicians and fellow philosophers, The Uses of Argument has been an enduring source of inspiration and discussion to students of argumentation from all kinds of disciplinary background for more than forty years.



Examining Argumentation In Context


Examining Argumentation In Context
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK
READ ONLINE
Author : Frans H. van Eemeren
language : en
Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing
Release Date : 2009-06-11

Examining Argumentation In Context written by Frans H. van Eemeren and has been published by John Benjamins Publishing this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2009-06-11 with Philosophy categories.


Examining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering contains a selection of papers on strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Starting point of all of these contributions is that a satisfactory analysis and evaluation of strategic maneuvering is possible only if the argumentative discourse is first situated in the communicative and interactional context in which it occurs. While some of the contributions present general views with regard to strategic maneuvering, other contributions report on the results of empirical studies, examine strategic maneuvering in a particular legal or political context, or highlight the presentational design of strategic maneuvering. Examining Argumentation in Context therefore provides an insightful view of recent developments in the research on strategic maneuvering, which is currently prominent in the study of argumentation.