[PDF] Performance Assessment For Low Level Radioactive Waste Management And Disposal At Doe Facilities - eBooks Review

Performance Assessment For Low Level Radioactive Waste Management And Disposal At Doe Facilities


Performance Assessment For Low Level Radioactive Waste Management And Disposal At Doe Facilities
DOWNLOAD

Download Performance Assessment For Low Level Radioactive Waste Management And Disposal At Doe Facilities PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Performance Assessment For Low Level Radioactive Waste Management And Disposal At Doe Facilities book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages. If the content not found or just blank you must refresh this page





The Performance Assessment Process For Doe Low Level Waste Disposal Facilities


The Performance Assessment Process For Doe Low Level Waste Disposal Facilities
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1992

The Performance Assessment Process For Doe Low Level Waste Disposal Facilities written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1992 with categories.


Safety of the low-level waste disposal facilities, as well as al US DOE facilities, is a primary criterion in their design and operation. Safety of low-level waste disposal facilities is evaluated from two perspectives. Operational safety is evaluated based on the perceived level of hazard of the operation. The safety evaluations vary from simple safety assessments to very complex safety analysis reports, depending on the degree of hazard associated with the facility operation. Operational requirements for the Department's low-level waste disposal facilities, including long-term safety are contained in DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Management (1). This paper will focus on the process of conducting long-term performance analyses rather than on operational safety analysis.



Performance Assessment For Low Level Radioactive Waste Management And Disposal At Doe Facilities


Performance Assessment For Low Level Radioactive Waste Management And Disposal At Doe Facilities
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1992

Performance Assessment For Low Level Radioactive Waste Management And Disposal At Doe Facilities written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1992 with categories.


Department of Energy (DOE) facilities, located at sites across the nation, generate large quantities and a wide variety of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) from nuclear defense production and research and development activities. All DOE-generated LLRW is disposed of at DOE disposal sites. Most DOE waste generating sites do not have disposal facilities on site and so must ship their LLRW to one of six currently active DOE disposal locations. Four disposal sites are located in generally arid regions: the Hanford Reservation (HANF) in the state of Washington, the Nevada Test Site (NTS), the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL), and the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in New Mexico. The other two disposal sites are located in the humid southeast: The Savannah River Plant (SRP) in South Carolina and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Tennessee.



Guidelines For Radiological Performance Assessment Of Doe Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Sites


Guidelines For Radiological Performance Assessment Of Doe Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Sites
DOWNLOAD
Author : Marilyn J. Case
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1988

Guidelines For Radiological Performance Assessment Of Doe Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Sites written by Marilyn J. Case and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1988 with Radioactive waste disposal categories.




Performance Assessment Review Guide For Doe Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities


Performance Assessment Review Guide For Doe Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities
DOWNLOAD
Author : Robert L. Dodge
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1991

Performance Assessment Review Guide For Doe Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities written by Robert L. Dodge and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1991 with categories.




Maintenance Plan For The Performance Assessments And Composite Analyses For The Area 3 And Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites At The Nevada Test Site


Maintenance Plan For The Performance Assessments And Composite Analyses For The Area 3 And Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites At The Nevada Test Site
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2002

Maintenance Plan For The Performance Assessments And Composite Analyses For The Area 3 And Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites At The Nevada Test Site written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2002 with categories.


U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 435.1 requires that performance assessments (PAs) and composite analyses (CAs) for low-level waste (LLW) disposal facilities be maintained by the field offices. This plan describes the activities to be performed in maintaining the Performance Assessment (PA) and Composite Analysis (CA) for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites (RWMSs) at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). The Disposal Authorization Statement (DAS) for the continuing operations of a LLW facility at the DOE complex specifies the conditions for operations based on approval of a PA and CA, and requires the facility to implement a maintenance program to assure that these conditions will remain protective of the public health and the environment in the future. The goal of the maintenance program is to provide that assurance. The maintenance process is an iterative one in which changing conditions may result in a revision of PA and CA; the revised PA and CA may impose a different set of conditions for facility operation, closure, and postclosure. The maintenance process includes managing uncertainty, performing annual reviews, submitting annual summary reports to DOE Headquarters (DOE/HQ), carrying out special analyses, and revising the PAs and CAs, if necessary. Management of uncertainty is an essential component of the maintenance program because results of the original PAs and CAs are understood to be based on uncertain assumptions about the conceptual models; the mathematical models and parameters; and the future state of the lands, disposal facilities, and human activities. The annual reviews for the PAs include consideration of waste receipts, facility specific factors, results of monitoring, and results of research and development (R & D) activities. Likewise, results of ongoing R & D, changes in land-use planning, new information on known sources of residual radioactive materials, and identification of new sources may warrant an evaluation to determine the impacts on the conclusions of the CAs.



Doe Site Performance Assessment Activities Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program


Doe Site Performance Assessment Activities Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1990

Doe Site Performance Assessment Activities Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1990 with categories.


Information on performance assessment capabilities and activities was collected from eight DOE sites. All eight sites either currently dispose of low-level radioactive waste (LLW) or plan to dispose of LLW in the near future. A survey questionnaire was developed and sent to key individuals involved in DOE Order 5820.2A performance assessment activities at each site. The sites surveyed included: Hanford Site (Hanford), Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL), Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Nevada Test Site (NTS), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (Paducah), Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (Portsmouth), and Savannah River Site (SRS). The questionnaire addressed all aspects of the performance assessment process; from waste source term to dose conversion factors. This report presents the information developed from the site questionnaire and provides a comparison of site-specific performance assessment approaches, data needs, and ongoing and planned activities. All sites are engaged in completing the radioactive waste disposal facility performance assessment required by DOE Order 5820.2A. Each site has achieved various degrees of progress and have identified a set of critical needs. Within several areas, however, the sites identified common needs and questions.



Summary Of Conceptual Models And Data Needs To Support The Inl Remote Handled Low Level Waste Disposal Facility Performance Assessment And Composite Analysis


Summary Of Conceptual Models And Data Needs To Support The Inl Remote Handled Low Level Waste Disposal Facility Performance Assessment And Composite Analysis
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2010

Summary Of Conceptual Models And Data Needs To Support The Inl Remote Handled Low Level Waste Disposal Facility Performance Assessment And Composite Analysis written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2010 with categories.


An overview of the technical approach and data required to support development of the performance assessment, and composite analysis are presented for the remote handled low-level waste disposal facility on-site alternative being considered at Idaho National Laboratory. Previous analyses and available data that meet requirements are identified and discussed. Outstanding data and analysis needs are also identified and summarized. The on-site disposal facility is being evaluated in anticipation of the closure of the Radioactive Waste Management Complex at the INL. An assessment of facility performance and of the composite performance are required to meet the Department of Energy's Low-Level Waste requirements (DOE Order 435.1, 2001) which stipulate that operation and closure of the disposal facility will be managed in a manner that is protective of worker and public health and safety, and the environment. The corresponding established procedures to ensure these protections are contained in DOE Manual 435.1-1, Radioactive Waste Management Manual (DOE M 435.1-1 2001). Requirements include assessment of (1) all-exposure pathways, (2) air pathway, (3) radon, and (4) groundwater pathway doses. Doses are computed from radionuclide concentrations in the environment. The performance assessment and composite analysis are being prepared to assess compliance with performance objectives and to establish limits on concentrations and inventories of radionuclides at the facility and to support specification of design, construction, operation and closure requirements. Technical objectives of the PA and CA are primarily accomplished through the development of an establish inventory, and through the use of predictive environmental transport models implementing an overarching conceptual framework. This document reviews the conceptual model, inherent assumptions, and data required to implement the conceptual model in a numerical framework. Available site-specific data and data sources are then addressed. Differences in required analyses and data are captured as outstanding data needs.



Performance Assessment Monitoring Plan For The Hanford Site Low Level Waste Burial Grounds


Performance Assessment Monitoring Plan For The Hanford Site Low Level Waste Burial Grounds
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2000

Performance Assessment Monitoring Plan For The Hanford Site Low Level Waste Burial Grounds written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2000 with categories.


As directed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL), Fluor Hanford, Inc. will implement the requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, as the requirements relate to the continued operation of the low-level waste disposal facilities on the Hanford Site. DOE Order 435.1 requires a disposal authorization statement authorizing operation (or continued operation) of a low-level waste disposal facility. The objective of this Order is to ensure that all DOE radioactive waste is managed in a manner that protects the environment and personnel and public health and safety. The manual (DOE Order 435.1 Manual) implementing the Order states that a disposal authorization statement shall be issued based on a review of the facility's performance assessment and composite analysis or appropriate Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 documentation. The disposal authorization shall specify the limits and conditions on construction, design, operations, and closure of the low-level waste facility. Failure to obtain a disposal authorization statement shall result in shutdown of an operational disposal facility. In fulfillment of the requirements of DOE Order 435.1, a disposal authorization statement was issued on October 25, 1999, authorizing the Hanford Site to transfer, receive, possess, and dispose of low-level radioactive waste at the 200 East Area and the 200 West Area Low-Level Burial Grounds. The disposal authorization statement constitutes approval of the performance assessment and composite analysis, authorizes operation of the facility, and includes conditions that the disposal facility must meet. One of the conditions is that monitoring plans for the 200 East Area and 200 West Area Low-Level Burial Grounds be written and approved by the DOE-RL. The monitoring plan is to be updated and implemented within 1 year following issuance of the disposal authorization statement to incorporate and implement conditions specified in the statement. The plan must meet the following criteria. The site-specific performance assessment and composite analysis shall be used to determine the media, locations, radionuclides, and other substances monitored. The environmental monitoring program shall be designed to include measuring and evaluating releases, migration of radionuclides, disposal unit subsidence, and changes in disposal facility and disposal site parameters that may affect long-term performance. The environmental monitoring programs shall be capable of detecting changing trends in performance to allow application of any necessary corrective action before exceeding the performance objectives stated in the order.



Unreviewed Disposal Question


Unreviewed Disposal Question
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2000

Unreviewed Disposal Question written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2000 with categories.


The Department of Energy's waste management Order, DOE O 435.1, requires that low--level waste disposal facilities develop and maintain a radiological performance assessment to ensure that disposal operations are within a performance envelope defined by performance objectives for long-term protection of the public and the environment. The Order also requires that a radiological composite analysis be developed and maintained to ensure that the disposal facility, in combination with other sources of radioactive material that may remain when all DOE activities have ceased, will not compromise future radiological protection of the public and the environment. The Order further requires that a Disposal Authorization Statement (DAS) be obtained from DOE Headquarters and that the disposal facility be operated within the performance assessment, composite analysis, and DAS. Maintenance of the performance assessment and composite analysis includes conducting test, research, and monitoring activit ies to increase confidence in the results of the analyses. It also includes updating the analyses as changes are proposed in the disposal operations, or other information requiring an update, becomes available. Personnel at the Savannah River Site have developed and implemented an innovative process for reviewing proposed or discovered changes in low-level radioactive waste disposal operations. The process is a graded approach to determine, in a disciplined manner, whether changes are within the existing performance envelope, as defined by the performance assessment, composite analysis, and DAS, or whether additional analysis is required to authorize the change. This process is called the Unreviewed Disposal Question (UDQ) process. It has been developed to be analogous to the Unreviewed Safety Question (UDQ) process that has been in use within DOE for many years. This is the first formalized system implemented in the DOE complex to examine low-level waste disposal changes the way the U nreviewed Safety Question process examines changes in nuclear facility operations. The process, which ensures that proposed or discovered changes receive the appropriate level of review, is now being used whenever changes such as new waste streams or changes in the design of a waste disposal unit are proposed at SRS. The process involves going through a series of questions to ensure that the change is within the existing performance envelope. Two series of questions are used. The first is a simple screening process. If the change is obviously within the performance envelope, it will be screened from further evaluation. If it cannot be screened, technical personnel involved in the performance assessment, composite analysis, and DAS processes, perform a more detailed evaluation using the second set of questions. If the evaluation shows that the change is within the performance envelope, it can be approved within the contractor's organization. If the evaluation does not clearly conclude t hat the change is within the performance envelope, then a Special Analysis or other more extensive study is triggered. This is a disciplined way to be sure that one knows which changes are significant and which are not, so that the proper attention can be given to the changes that are significant.



Issues In Performance Assessments For Disposal Of Us Department Of Energy Low Level Waste


Issues In Performance Assessments For Disposal Of Us Department Of Energy Low Level Waste
DOWNLOAD
Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1994

Issues In Performance Assessments For Disposal Of Us Department Of Energy Low Level Waste written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1994 with categories.


The US Department of Energy (DOE) and its contractors have long been pioneers in the field of radiological performance assessment (PA). Much effort has been expended in developing technology and acquiring data to facilitate the assessment process. This is reflected in DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Management Chapter III of the Order lists policy and requirements to manage the DOEs low-level waste; performance objectives for low-level waste management are stated to ensure the protection of public health and the environment. A radiological PA is also required to demonstrate compliance with the performance objectives. DOE Order 5820.2A further requires that an Oversight and Peer Review Panel be established to ensure consistency and technical quality around the DOE complex in the development and application of PA models that include site-specific geohydrology and waste composition. The DOE has also established a Performance Assessment Task Team (PATT) to integrate the activities of sites that are preparing PAs. The PATT's purpose is to recommend policy and guidance to DOE on issues that impact PAs so that the approaches taken are as consistent as possible across the DOE complex.