[PDF] The President Shall Nominate - eBooks Review

The President Shall Nominate


The President Shall Nominate
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK

Download The President Shall Nominate PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get The President Shall Nominate book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages. If the content not found or just blank you must refresh this page





The President Shall Nominate


The President Shall Nominate
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK

Author : Mitchel A. Sollenberger
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2008

The President Shall Nominate written by Mitchel A. Sollenberger and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2008 with Biography & Autobiography categories.


A comprehensive and path-breaking study of what happens behind the scenes before presidents publicly announce to the Senate--and, thus, the nation--their nominees for federal positions.



Supreme Court Appointment Process


Supreme Court Appointment Process
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK

Author : Congressional Service
language : en
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
Release Date : 2018-07-04

Supreme Court Appointment Process written by Congressional Service and has been published by Createspace Independent Publishing Platform this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2018-07-04 with categories.


The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an event of major significance in American politics. Each appointment is of consequence because of the enormous judicial power the Supreme Court exercises as the highest appellate court in the federal judiciary. Appointments are usually infrequent, as a vacancy on the nine-member Court may occur only once or twice, or never at all, during a particular President's years in office. Under the Constitution, Justices on the Supreme Court receive what can amount to lifetime appointments which, by constitutional design, helps ensure the Court's independence from the President and Congress. The procedure for appointing a Justice is provided for by the Constitution in only a few words. The "Appointments Clause" (Article II, Section 2, clause 2) states that the President "shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court." The process of appointing Justices has undergone changes over two centuries, but its most basic feature-the sharing of power between the President and Senate-has remained unchanged: To receive appointment to the Court, a candidate must first be nominated by the President and then confirmed by the Senate. Political considerations typically play an important role in Supreme Court appointments. It is often assumed, for example, that Presidents will be inclined to select a nominee whose political or ideological views appear compatible with their own. The political nature of the appointment process becomes especially apparent when a President submits a nominee with controversial views, there are sharp partisan or ideological differences between the President and the Senate, or the outcome of important constitutional issues before the Court is seen to be at stake. Additionally, over more than two centuries, a recurring theme in the Supreme Court appointment process has been the assumed need for professional excellence in a nominee. During recent presidencies, nominees have at the time of nomination, most often, served as U.S. appellate court judges. The integrity and impartiality of an individual have also been important criteria for a President when selecting a nominee for the Court. The speed by which a President selects a nominee for a vacancy has varied during recent presidencies. A President might announce his intention to nominate a particular individual within several days of when a vacancy becomes publicly known, or a President might take multiple weeks or months to announce a nominee. The factors affecting the speed by which a President selects a nominee include whether a President had advance notice of a Justice's plan to retire, as well as when during the calendar year a Justice announces his or her departure from the Court. On rare occasions, Presidents also have made Court appointments without the Senate's consent, when the Senate was in recess. Such "recess appointments," however, were temporary, with their terms expiring at the end of the Senate's next session. Recess appointments have, at times, been considered controversial because they bypassed the Senate and its "advice and consent" role. The last recess appointment to the Court was made in 1958 when President Eisenhower appointed Potter Stewart as an Associate Justice (Justice Stewart was confirmed by the Senate the following year).



Supreme Court Appointment Process


Supreme Court Appointment Process
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK

Author : Denis Steven Rutkus
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2006

Supreme Court Appointment Process written by Denis Steven Rutkus and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2006 with Executive power categories.


The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an event of major significance in American politics. Each appointment is important because of the enormous judicial power the Supreme Court exercises as the highest appellate court in the federal judiciary. Appointments are usually infrequent, as a vacancy on the 9-member Court may occur only once or twice, or never at all, during a particular President's years in office. Under the Constitution, Justices on the Supreme Court receive lifetime appointments. Such job security in the government has been conferred solely on judges and, by constitutional design, helps insure the Court's independence from the President and Congress. The procedure for appointing a Justice is provided for by the Constitution in only a few words. The "Appointments Clause" (Article II, Section 2, clause 2) states that the President "shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court." The process of appointing Justices has undergone changes over two centuries, but its most basic feature -- the sharing of power between the President and Senate -- has remained unchanged: To receive lifetime appointment to the Court, a candidate must first be nominated by the President and then confirmed by the Senate. Although not mentioned in the Constitution, an important role is played midway in the process by the Senate Judiciary Committee. The appointment of a Justice might or might not proceed smoothly. From the first appointments in 1789, the Senate has confirmed 122 out of 158 Court nominations. A recurring theme in the appointment process has been the assumed need for excellence in a nominee. However, politics also has played an important role in Supreme Court appointments. The political nature of the appointment process becomes especially apparent when a President submits a nominee with controversial views or there are sharp ideological differences between the President and the Senate.



The President S Czars


The President S Czars
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK

Author : Mitchel A. Sollenberger
language : en
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
Release Date : 2012-04-27

The President S Czars written by Mitchel A. Sollenberger and has been published by University Press of Kansas this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2012-04-27 with Political Science categories.


Faced with crises that would challenge any president, Barack Obama authorized "pay czar" Kenneth Feinberg to oversee the $20 billion fund for victims of the BP oil spill and to establish—and enforce—executive pay guidelines for companies that received $700 billion in federal bailout money. Feinberg's office comes with vastly expansive policy powers along with seemingly deep pockets; yet his position does not formally fit anywhere within our government's constitutional framework. The very word "czar" seems inappropriate in a constitutional republic, but it has come to describe any executive branch official who has significant authority over a policy area, works independently of agency or Department heads, and is not confirmed by the Senate-or subject to congressional oversight. Mitchel Sollenberger and Mark Rozell provide the first comprehensive overview of presidential czars, tracing the history of the position from its origins through its initial expansion under FDR and its dramatic growth during the presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama. The President's Czars shows how, under pressure to act on the policy front, modern presidents have increasingly turned to these appointed officials, even though by doing so they violate the Appointments Clause and can also run into conflict with the nondelegation doctrine and the principle that a president cannot unilaterally establish offices without legislative support. Further, Sollenberger and Rozell contend that czars not only are ill-conceived but also disrupt a governing system based on democratic accountability. A sobering overview solidly grounded in public law analysis, this study serves as a counter-argument to those who would embrace an excessively powerful presidency, one with relatively limited constraints. Among other things, it proposes the restoration of accountability—starting with significant changes to Title 3 of the U.S. Code, which authorizes the president to appoint White House employees "without regard to any other provision of law." Ultimately, the authors argue that czars have generally not done a good job of making the executive branch bureaucracy more effective and efficient. Whatever utility presidents may see in appointing czars, Sollenberger and Rozell make a strong case that the overall damage to our constitutional system is great-and that this runaway practice has to stop.



Supreme Court Appointment Process


Supreme Court Appointment Process
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK

Author : Denis Steven Rutkus
language : en
Publisher: Nova Publishers
Release Date : 2005

Supreme Court Appointment Process written by Denis Steven Rutkus and has been published by Nova Publishers this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2005 with Law categories.


The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an infrequent event of major significance in American politics. Each appointment is important because of the enormous judicial power the Supreme Court exercises as the highest appellate court in the federal judiciary. Appointments are infrequent, as a vacancy on the nine member Court may occur only once or twice, or never at all, during a particular President's years in office. Under the Constitution, Justices on the Supreme Court receive lifetime appointments. Such job security in the government has been conferred solely on judges and, by constitutional design, helps insure the Court's independence from the President and Congress. The procedure for appointing a Justice is provided for by the Constitution in only a few words. The "Appointments Clause" (Article II, Section 2, clause 2) states that the President "shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the Spreme Court." The process of appointing Justices has undergone changes over two centuries, but its most basic feature -- the sharing of power between the President and Senate -- has remained unchanged: To receive lifetime appointment to the Court, a candidate must first be nominated by the President and then confirmed by the Senate. Although not mentioned in the Constitution, an important role is played midway in the process (after the President selects, but before the Senate considers) by the Senate Judiciary Committee. On rare occasions, Presidents also have made Court appointments without the Senate's consent, when the Senate was in recess. Such "recess appointments," however, were temporary, with their terms expiring at the end of the Senate's next session. The last recess appointments to the Court, made in the 1950s, were controversial, because they bypassed the Senate and its "advice and consent" role. The appointment of a Justice might or might not proceed smoothly. Since the appointment of the first Justices in 1789, the Senate has confirmed 120 Supreme Court nominations out of 154 received. Of the 34 unsuccessful nominations, 11 were rejected in Senate roll-call votes, while nearly all of the rest, in the face of committee or Senate opposition to the nominee or the President, were withdrawn by the President or were postponed, tabled, or never voted on by the Senate. Over more than two centuries, a recurring theme in the Supreme Court appointment process has been the assumed need for excellence in a nominee. However, politics also has played an important role in Supreme Court appointments. The political nature of the appointment process becomes especially apparent when a President submits a nominee with controversial views, there are sharp partisan or ideological differences between the President and the Senate, or the outcome of important constitutional issues before the Court is seen to be at stake.



Selected Cases On Government And Administration


Selected Cases On Government And Administration
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK

Author : Frank Johnson Goodnow
language : en
Publisher: General Books
Release Date : 2012-02

Selected Cases On Government And Administration written by Frank Johnson Goodnow and has been published by General Books this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2012-02 with categories.


Purchase of this book includes free trial access to www.million-books.com where you can read more than a million books for free. This is an OCR edition with typos. Excerpt from book: CHAPTER II. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION. I. The President. 1. The Power of Appointment. 'APPOINTMENTS TO OFFICE?CASE OF LIEUTENANT COXE. 4 Opin. Attys. Qen. 217. Attorney General's Office, August 7, 1843. Sir: . . . The facts applicable to the questions presented are these: Mr. Coxe, for some years anterior to 1837, held a commission as a lieutenant in the navy of the United States, which, under circumstances regarded by him as peculiarly oppressive, he resigned. His resignation was accepted. On the 16th February, 1837, he was nominated to the Senate by President Jackson as a lieutenant in the navy from that date. On the 3d March, 1837, the Senate, by resolution, advised and consented to his nomination, the nominee to take rank next after Lieutenant Elisha Peck. Upon the receipt of this resolution at the Navy Department, a commission was made out accordingly, but it never was signed by the President. Under these circumstances, Mr. Coxe, in his letter to the Secretary of the Navy, of the 28th June, 1843, insists that he is a lieutenant in the navy of the United States, and asks that his claim may be inquired into, and that a commission may be issued to him as such lieutenant. The case involves two questions: 1st, assuming the action of the Senate on the nomination of the 16th of February, 1837, to have been regular, whether that nomination, and the advice and consent of the Senate thereon, amount to an appointment, so as to entitle Mr. Coxe to the commission claimed by him? . . . The power of appoinment is conferred and defined by the 2d article of the Constitution of the United States, which provides that the President shall nominate, and, by and with the adviceand consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers, and consuls, judges...



Supreme Court Nominations


Supreme Court Nominations
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK

Author : Betsy Palmer
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 2009

Supreme Court Nominations written by Betsy Palmer and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2009 with Judges categories.


The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an event of major significance in American politics. Each appointment is important because of the enormous judicial power the Supreme Court exercises as the highest appellate court in the federal judiciary. Appointments are usually infrequent, as a vacancy on the nine member Court may occur only once or twice, or never at all, during a particular President's years in office. Under the Constitution, Justices on the Supreme Court receive lifetime appointments. Such job security in the government has been conferred solely on judges and, by constitutional design, helps insure the Court's independence from the President and Congress. The procedure for appointing a Justice is provided for by the Constitution in only a few words. The "Appointments Clause" (Article II, Section 2, clause 2) states that the President "shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint . . . Judges of the supreme Court." The process of appointing Justices has undergone changes over two centuries, but its most basic feature -- the sharing of power between the President and Senate -- has remained unchanged: To receive lifetime appointment to the Court, a candidate must first be nominated by the President and then confirmed by the Senate. Although not mentioned in the Constitution, an important role is played midway in the process (after the President selects, but before the Senate considers) by the Senate Judiciary Committee. On rare occasions, Presidents also have made Court appointments without the Senate's consent, when the Senate was in recess. Such "recess appointments," however, were temporary, with their terms expiring at the end of the Senate's next session. The last recess appointments to the Court, made in the 1950s, were controversial because they bypassed the Senate and its "advice and consent" role. The appointment of a Justice might or might not proceed smoothly. From the first appointments in 1789, the Senate has confirmed 122 out of 158 Court nominations. Of the 36 unsuccessful nominations, 11 were rejected in Senate roll-call votes, while nearly all of the rest, in the face of committee or Senate opposition to the nominee or the President, were withdrawn by the President or were postponed, tabled, or never voted on by the Senate. Over more than two centuries, a recurring theme in the Supreme Court appointment process has been the assumed need for excellence in a nominee. However, politics also has played an important role in Supreme Court appointments. The political nature of the appointment process becomes especially apparent when a President submits a nominee with controversial views, there are sharp partisan or ideological differences between the President and the Senate, or the outcome of important constitutional issues before the Court is seen to be at stake.



Science And Technology In The National Interest


Science And Technology In The National Interest
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK

Author : Institute of Medicine
language : en
Publisher: National Academies Press
Release Date : 2005-02-23

Science And Technology In The National Interest written by Institute of Medicine and has been published by National Academies Press this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 2005-02-23 with Political Science categories.


In 2004, an ad hoc committee was charged with preparing this third report examining the most senior S&T appointments to federal government positions and updating the accompanying list of the most urgent S&T presidential appointments. Sufficient changes have occurred since the National Academies 2000 report on presidential appointmentsâ€"including the 2001 terrorist attacks, the anthrax deaths, the reorganization of homeland-security activities in the federal government, new developments in S&T, and concerns about the politicization of S&T decision making and adviceâ€"to warrant this new edition. In contrast with previous reports on the subject, this one covers not only presidential appointments to top S&T leadership positions but also the appointment of scientists, engineers, and health professionals to serve on federal advisory committees that focus on science-based policy or on the review of research proposals. The committee recognizes that other areas of federal responsibility are as important as S&T, but S&T appointments are the only ones within its purview.



Nomination And Election Of The President And Vice President Of The United States


Nomination And Election Of The President And Vice President Of The United States
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK

Author : United States. Congress. Senate. Library
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1976-03

Nomination And Election Of The President And Vice President Of The United States written by United States. Congress. Senate. Library and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1976-03 with Political conventions categories.




Nomination And Election Of The President And Vice President Of The United States Including The Manner Of Selecting Delegates To National Political Conventions


Nomination And Election Of The President And Vice President Of The United States Including The Manner Of Selecting Delegates To National Political Conventions
DOWNLOAD
AUDIOBOOK

Author :
language : en
Publisher:
Release Date : 1960

Nomination And Election Of The President And Vice President Of The United States Including The Manner Of Selecting Delegates To National Political Conventions written by and has been published by this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on 1960 with Election law categories.